|
NOTES
Introduction
1. Nely Camargo and Virgílio
B.Noya Pinto, Communication Policies in Brazil,
p.41.
2. Wayne A. Selcher, The National
Security Doctrine and Policies of the Brazilian Government,
p.24.
Chapter 1
1. Muniz Sodré, O Monopólio
da Fala, p.9.
2. Nely Camargo and Virgiho B.Noya
Pinto, Communication Policies in Brazil, p.41.
3. "Salute: A Globo Levou o Troféu
dos Americanos," Isto É, 14 March 1979, p.94.
4. "Reações à Lei: O Novo Código
de Menores Provoca um Debate," Veja, 28 November
1979, p.129.
5. "The Globo Television Network
Shows," in Brazil: Country, People, Television,a
promotional booklet produced by TV Globo Network and
distributed when it received the "Salute" trophy in
New York, March 1979.
6. "Vinte Anos de Televisão," Veja,
23 Septem 1970, p.61. It should be noted that the first
Latin American television was Mexico City's XH-TV, which
began broadcasting on 31 August 1950.
7. Ibid, p.61.
8. Ibid., p.63.
9. Sodré, O Monopólio, p.95.
10. "Global Report: New Development
and the Outlook for Television, as Reported on the Scene
from Major Areas of the World," Television Age,19
Ju1~ 1965, P.31.
11. Gerald Thomas, "Closely Watched
TV," Index on Censorship: Brazil, 8, no.4(July-August
1979):43.
12. Sodré, O Monopólio, p.95.
13. Veja, nº 107 (23 September
1970)p. 63
14. Gabriel Cohn, "Mudar Os Conteúdos
Não É Decisivo," Receita Brasil (1978),p.188.
15. "Global Report," 31 January
1966, P.30.
16. Jeremy Tunstall, The Media
Are American, 1977 p.182. He further states that
"Chateaubriand group disintegrated with the death of
its founder and another media group, Globo, had by the
early 1970's achieved an even dominant position in the
Brazilian media" (p. 182).
17. Thomas, "Closely Watched TV,"
p.43.
18. João Rodolfo do Prado, TV:
Quem Vê Quem, p.127
19. Television Age, 31 January
1966, p.30.
20. Prado, TV, p.121
21. Ibid.,p.ll5.
22. Tunstall, The Media,
p.182.
23. Thomas, "Closely Watched TV,"
p. 44.
24. Mario de Moraes and Ronaldo
Moraes, "João Calmon denuncia: TV Globo na etapa do
açúcar, O Cruzeiro, 29 April 1967, p. 80.
25. Antônio F.Costella, O Controle
da Informação no no Brasil,p.138.
26. Television Age, 19 July
1965,p.32.
27. "The Globo Network," in Brazil:
Country, People, Television. According to that publication
"Globo Network owns 2,000 square kilometers of privately
constructed microwave interlace. This ranks Brazil second
only to the United States among countries with the most
extensive microwave systems in the world."
28. Sodré, O Monopólio, p.l00.
29. "Global mesmo: A Network of
Brazil Sai Pelo Mundo," Veja, 14 February 1979,
p. 65.
30. Prado, TV, p.211. See
also Veja, 14 February 1979,Pp.65-66; Brazil:
Country,People,Tele-vision,1979; and The
Miami Herald, 2 August 1981.
31. "Television Serials," in Brazil:Country,
People, Television. It should be noted that during
its development, Brazilian television could not depend
on a film industry, as American television could. However,
since 1960 a genre, which is neither film nor theater,
has been developed by Brazilian producers, namely, the
"Telenovela" (soap opera), which is produced nationally
and which maintains high audience ratings. The television
critic of the Brazilian weekly newsmagazine Veja,
as quoted in Globo's booklet, says that "Gbbo did not
invent the 'telenovela.' From its studios, however,
came the decisive contribution towards making it a cinematographic
genre of near-Hollywood proportions, though typically
Brazilian in treatment, theme, style, and its extremely
heavy production schedules. Globo's four current television
serials considered as a whole are the equivalent of
a full-length feature film per night."
32. Brasil em dados-75, p.189.
33. Guy Gugliotta, "Brazil Moves
into TV Age with Astounding Success," The Miami Herald,
2 August 1981.
Chapter 2
1. Wayne A. Selcher, The
National Security Doctrine and Policies of the Brazilian
Government, 1977, Pp. 2-3.
2. Thomas E. Weil et al., Area
Handbook for Brazil,1975,p. 248.
3. Ibid.,pgs 249 and 393.
4. Ibid.,p.250.
5. Maurício Dias, "Aquela que Tomou
o Poder," Isto É no. 16 (14 March 1979),pp.54-55.
In addition, Dias explains that the Escola Superior
de Guerra is located in Fort São João, in Rio de Janeiro,
and occupies five buildings, in which there are three
auditoriums, twenty study rooms and one specialized
library with approximately 20,000 books.
6. Selcher, National Security
Doctrine, p.3.
7. Gordon Campbell, Brazil Struggles
for Development, l972 , Pp. 80-81.
8. Enjolras José de Castro Camargo,
Estudo de Problemas Brazileiros, p.47. See also
Selcher, National Security Doctrine, 1977,p.8.
9. Campbell, Brazil, p.84.
10. Castro Camargo, Estudo,
Pp.53-54.
11. Selcher, National Security
Doctrine, 9
12. Barry Ames, Rhetoric and
Reality in a Militarized Regime: Brazil Since 1964,p.8.
13. Campbell, Brazil, p.83.
14. Ibid., p.86. José Odelso Schneider,
et al., Realidade Brasileira, p. 230.
15. Selcher, National Security
Doctrine, 1977, p.12.
16. Schneider, Realidade Brasileira,
pp.231-232.
17. Selcher, National Security
Doctrine, p.15.
18. Ibid. ,p.17.
19. Castro Camargo, Estudo,
p.236.
20. Selcher, National Security
Doctrine,p. 7, says that "the phrase 'Security and
Development,’ the modern equivalent of the national
flag's motto of 'Order and Progress,' has become the
watchword and legitimizer of military rule extending
into the indefinite future."
22. Campbell, Brazil, p.116.
In addition Campbell states on page 117 that "after
the football triumph, they brought out the slogans and
the sticker labels, from the President's 'No one can
stop this country' (Ninguém segura este país) to 'Brazil,
love it or leave it!,' 'Brazil, I'm staying!,’ and 'Brazil,
count me! "
Chapter 3
1. Nely Camargo, and Virgílio
B.Noya Pinto, Communication Policies in Brazil,
p.65.
2. Wayne A.Selcher, The National
Security Doctrine and Policies of the Brazilian Government,P.17,
gives some examples of censorship in Brazil
Censorship... has
been used to discourage both press sensationalism
and full public knowledge or debate about topics such
as the 1974-76 meningitis epidemic, frequent high
clerical criticisms of the government, rumored political
openings, torture of political prisoners, financial
scandals, expulsion of urban squatters or peasants
from land, terrorist and guerrilla activity, and presidential
succession, all in the name of national security.
3. Gerald Thomas, "Closely Watched
TV,"Pp.43-46.
4. Camargo, Communication Policies,
p.62.
5. Antônio F.Costella, O Controle
da Informação, p.125.
6. Mauro Almeida, A Comunicação
de Massa noBrasil , p.43. On the same page Almeida
says that the first Brazilian radio station was established
on 6 April 1919, the "Ra~dio Clube de Pernambuco," in
Recife. However, other historians do not consider that
station as the first in Brazil because it was primarily
a telegraphic system, transmitting and receiving messages
through Morse Code
7. Camargo, Communication Policies,
pp.24-25.
It should be noted that the national
Council of Telecommunications (Contel) was disbanded
in 1972 by Decree no.70,583. However, after four years,
Contel was recreated by Decree-Law no.78,921, of 7 December
1976.
8. Ibid.,in footnote,p.24.
9. Selcher, National Security
Doctrine, p . 21
10. Elihu Katz, and George Wedell,
Broadcasting in the Third World,1977, p.45.
11. Gordon Campbell, Brazil Struggles
for Development, p.59.
12. Costella, O Controle,
p.138.
13. "Globo Organization," in Brazil:
Country, People, Television, 1979.
14. According to Mauro Almeida,
the Excelsior group had two television stations(Channel
2 in Rio and channel 9 in São Paulo) which had been
licensed for more than ten years before their licenses
were cancelled by Dentel( A Comunicação, l971,
p.58).
15. Camargo, Communication Policies,
p. 25.
16. Código Brasileiro de Telecomunicações.
See also Decree-law no.236, of 28 February 1967.
17. Decree-law no.236, 28 February
1967.
18. Katz and Wedell, Broadcasting,
p.75.
19. Camargo, Communication Policies,
p.29
20. Roberto Amaral Vieira, "O Papel
do Rádio e da Tevê na Formação da Cultura Brasileira
ou da Macrocefália à Atomização," ABEPEC, no.
4 (June 1978) pp.34-47.
21. The building to house the Ministry
of Communications was begun only in May 1973, in Brasília.
Its first minister was Carlos Simas. The Ministry of
Communications was established by Decree-law no.200,
of 25 February 1967.
22. Katz and Wedell, Broadcasting,
p.75.
23. Herbert I.Schiller, Mass
Communication and American Empire, p.33.
24. Camargo, Communication Policies,
p.28. See also, J.de Nazaré T. Dias, A Reforma Administrativa
de 1967, p.128; and Brazil para estudantes,
special supplement to Veja, no.447(30 March
1977),p.8.
25. Euclides Quandt de Oliveira,
Política de Comunicações, Pp.9-12, and 57.
26. Enjolras José de Castro Camargo,
Estudo de Problemas Brasileiros, p.241.
27. Ibid. ,pp.242-259.
28. "A Comunicação entre as pessoas,
agora é mais fácil," Brasil Para Estudantes,
a special supplement of Veja,no.447(30 March
1977),p.10.
29. Embratel, Relatório da Diretoria,
January 1977,p. 34.
30. Camargo, Communication Policies,Pp.28-29.
31. Embratel, Relatório,
1977,p.14.
32. Coriolano de Loiola Cabral Fagundes,
Censura e Liberdade de Expressão, Pp.156-163.
See also, Código Brasileiro de Telecomunicações.
33. Ernesto Geisel, Mensagem
ao Congresso Nacional, 1976, p.100.
34. Geisel, Mensagem ao Congresso
Nacional,1977, Pp.143-144.
35. The Jornal do Brasil,
in its so-called supplement B, on 29 April 1977, stated
that Radio-bra~s was creating special programs in order
to be broadcast toward African and Latin American countries.
The Jornal do Brasil also says that in 1977 Brazil
was making directional transmissions in three languages:
Portuguese, English, and German, through the powerful
250 KW transmitters of the Rádio Nacional de Brasilia,
one of the stations of Radiobrás.
36.Katz and Wedell,
Broadcasting, p.76.
37. World Communication: A 200
Country Survey of Press, Radio, Television, and Film,
Pp.223-224.
Chapter 4
1. Emílio Garrastazu Médici, an
army general, was the third president of the Revolutionary
Movement. During his term in office, strong censorship
was exercised and Institutional Act no.5 was passed,
which provided the executive with unlimited powers of
repression and was intensively used. The so-called Brazilian
Economic Miracle,which contributed to the improvement
of television, occurred during Médici's administration.
Economic influences on the development of Brazilian
television are discussed in Chapter 5.
2. Vigílio B.Noya
Pinto, "Historical Development of Mass Communication
in Brazil," in Communication Policies in Brazil,1975,
p.17
3. Leslie Bethell,
"Brazil: The Last 15 Years," Index on Censorship:
Brazil, 8,no.4(July-August 1979)pp.37. Discussing
the political system, Bethell says that the Brazilian
political system has always been to a greater or lesser
extent closed. Notwithstanding the liberal democratic
ideology which has found expression in successive constitutions
since Brazil's independence from Portugal --1824, 1891,
1934, 1946-- and despite the gradual extension of the
franchise during the Empire(1822-89), the
Old Republic(1889-1930), the period after
the Revolution of 1930 and, above all, in the post-war
period, the vast majority of Brazilians have been political
subjects rather than active effective participants in
national political life. Brazilian political culture,...is
in fact deeply authoritarian, or at best paternalistic.
The state even in the nineteenth century, but particularly
since 1930, has been remote from civil society and highly
bureaucratic. The dominant class, even while it has
been transformed and somewhat broadened during recent
decades of rapid economic and social change, has proved
highly skilled at maintaining effective social and political
control of the great mass of the Brazilian population(Pp.3-7
).
4. Ibid.,1979,p.5
5. José Odelso Schneider,
et al., RealidadeBrasileira, p.246.
6. Instituto de Planejamento
Econômico e Social (IPEA), Brasil: 14 Anos de Revolução
1978,p.ll.
7. Ibid.,p.ll.
8. José Marques de
Melo, Comunicação, Opinião, Desenvolvimento,
p.37.
9. João Rodolfo do
Prado, TV: Quem Vê Quem , Pp.139-140.
10. Thomas E.Weil
et al., Area Handbook for Brazil,p. 265.
11. Melo, Comunicação,
p.38.
12. Prado, TV
, p.224.
13. Nely Camargo,
and Virgílio B.Noya Pinto, Communication Policies
in Brazil, p.31.
14. Ibid.,p.31.
15. Elihu Katz, and
George Wedell, Broadcasting in the Third World: Promise
and Performance,p.34.
16. Euclides Quandt
de Oliveira, minister of communications, Brazil, addressing
the Fourth Centerwestern Congress of Broadcast on 18
May 1977,as reported in Jornal do Brasil, 20
May 1977.
17. Clovis Moura,
"Climate of Terror," Index on Censorship: Brazil,
8,no.4(July-August 1979),p.10.
18. Gerald Thomas,
"Closely Watched TV," Index on Censorship: Brazil,
8,no.4(July-August 1979) p.45.
19. Ibid.,p.45.
Chapter 5
l. Muniz Sodré, O
Monopólio da Fala,p.86.
2. John P. Dickenson,
Brazil: Studies in Industrial Geography, pp.8-11.
3. Muniz Sodré, A
Comunicacão do Grotesco, p.24
4. Gordon Campbell, Brazil
Struggles for Development,p.16.
5. Nely Camargo, and
Virgílio B.Noya Pinto, Communication Policies in
Brazil,p.20.
6. Ibid.,p.41.
7. Campbell, Brazil,
p.114.
8. Ibid.,p.85.
9.Thomas Pompeu de Souza
Brasil Netto, Analysis of the Brazilian Economic
Development,1973.
10. Campbell, Brazil,
p.69.
11. The first multinational
corporations(such as Ford, Armour, IBM, Firestone, and
others) were established in Brazil before 1939. After
1964, multinational corporations practically controlled
the engineering, electrical, vehicle, and pharmaceutical
industries in Brazil. See details in Dickenson Brazil:
Studies in Industrial Geography, 1978.
12. Alan Wells, Picture:
Tube Imperialism? The Impact of U.S. Television on Latin
America, p.132.
13. Campbell, Brazil,
p.110.
14. Joan R.Dassin, "Press
Censorship: How and why," Index on Censorship: Brazil,8,
no.4(July- August 1979)p.17.
15. Albert Fishlow, "Some
Reflections on Post-1964 Brazilian Economic Policy,"
in Authoritarian Brazil: Origins, Policies, and Future,
ed.Alfred Stepan, p.69. It should be noted that in the
same book, in his article entitled "The New Professionalism
of Internal Warfare and Military Role Expansion," Alfred
Stepan says that "since 1969, every ministry has had
an SNI (National Information Service) representative,
responsible for ensuring that all policy decisions of
the ministry give full considerations to national security
issues"(Pp.58-59).
16. Leslie Bethell, "Brazil:
The Last 15 Years," Index on Censorship: Brazil,
8, no.4(July-August 1979),p.4.
17. Fernando Henrique
Cardoso, "Associated--Dependent Development: Theoretical
and Practical Implications," in Authoritarian Brazil:
Origins, Policies, and Future, ed.Alfred Stepan,
p.144.
18, World Advertising
Expenditure,1978. It should be noted that the ten
countries that spent over one billion dollars in advertising
in 1976 were Australia, Brazil, Canada, France, Japan,the
Netherlands, Spain, the United Kingdom, the United States,
and West Germany.
19. Camargo, Communication
Policies, p.20.
20. World Bank, World
Development Report,1979.
21. Sodré, O Monopólio,
p.9l.
22. Emílio Garrastazu
Médici, Mensagem ao Congresso Nacional, 1974,p.174.
23. Brazil's present
day income distribution is better than before the 1964
revolution. However, Wayne A.Selcher says that "the
1970 census showed income more unevenly distributed
by class than in 1960. Brazil's present income distribution
can be likened to a small Sweden or Belgium inside a
giant Indonesia; according to one characterization,
about 5 million live at average European levels, about
15 million live at the standard of rich underdeveloped
countries, and over 80 million live at a standard of
living which is among Latin America's lowest"(The
National Security Doctrine and Policies of the Brazilian
Government,1977,p.13).
Chapter 6
1. Gordon Campbell, Brazil
Struggles for Development, p. 83.
2. Elihu Katz, and George
Wedell, Broadcasting in the Third World, p.75.
3. Nely Camargo, and
Virgílio B. Noya Pinto, Communication Policies in
Brazil, P.31.
4. See details about
the utilization of mass media communication to promote
national development in Wilbur Schramm, Mass Media
and National Development,1973; and Everett M.Rogers,
and F.Floyd Shoemaker, Communication of Innovations,l97l.
5. João Rodolfo do Prado,
TV: Quem Vê Quem, p.223.
6. See details in Everett
M.Rogers,ed., Communication and Development: Critical
Perspectives, 1976.
7. Gerald Thomas, "Closely
Watched TV," Index on Censorship: Brazil, 8,no.4(July-August
1979) p.46.
8. Camargo, Communication
Policies, p.65.
9. Herbert I.Schiller,
Mass Communications and American Empire, 1971,Pp.79-80.
10. "Além das Fronteiras,"
Veja, 10 January 1979,p.48.
11. Ibid.,p.48.
12. Ibid.,pp.48-50.
PREFACE / INTRODUCTION / 1. A BRIEF HISTORY OF BRAZILIAN TELEVISION
/ 2. THE IMPACT OF THE MILITARY REGIME ON TELEVISION
/ 3. THE INFLUENCE OF COMMUNICATION LAWS AND REGULATORY
AGENCIES ON THE GROWTH OF TELEVISION / 4.
POLITICAL INFLUENCES ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF TELEVISION
/ 5. SOCIOECONOMIC INFLUENCES ON THE DEVELOPMENT
OF TELEVISION / 6.SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS / 7. NOTES / 8. BIBLIOGRAPHY / 9.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
|